home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!redrobe.demon.co.uk
- From: Mike@Redrobe.demon.co.uk (Mike)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Storm C/C++ Comments
- Date: 03 Mar 96 19:09:59 +0000
- Message-ID: <603.6636T1149T2966@Redrobe.demon.co.uk>
- References: <DnL6Jv.Ivq@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: redrobe.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: redrobe.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)
-
-
- Hi, Jolyon Ralph , on 01-Mar-96 11:28:42 you scribbled....
- >I tried compiling some example code I've been working on, and the Storm
- >version was 2kb shorter (13Kb vs 15Kb) than the SAS version, BUT it ran
- >at less than half the speed of the SAS code! (Both were set for 68020
- >code ouptut, various optimiser options tested).
-
- then again gcc is generally faster than SAS....
-
-
- Mike
-
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Mike Redrobe - Mike@Redrobe.demon.co.uk MikeRR on #Amiga
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-